The pressuring you for sex / making you feel guilty that you’re not doing it enough / laughing at you for being too loud / refusing to remove the jewelry that makes you uncomfortable during sex … all of those things constitute as sexual abuse. He was not respecting your body or your consent and comfort. I would explore that aspect with a therapist as well because that’s not an easy thing to deal with.
I have to be honest, this comment has been following me all weekend. I read a lot and started writing a response twice. I'm still not sure how I feel about this.
I absolutely agree that the piercing stuff was abusive. Violating my trust by getting them without talking to me, then refusing to take them out for sex despite my discomfort was equivalent to forcing me to use painful sex toys. (And it recently occurred to me that him getting them just as I was making a job change in part to help our marriage was sabotage.) As I was already prone to chronic UTIs, I couldn't believe he was being so bullheaded about the irritation and damage the piercings were causing, but he actually kept getting larger and heavier jewelry. From an emotional standpoint, it felt like his choices came down to having sex with me or keeping the jewelry in [EDIT: while making me feel guilty for not wanting sex], and he chose the latter. That was all abuse.
The rest...I'm not sure I'm comfortable calling it that (at least not yet). Partly because, while I felt pressured for sex and guilty if we weren't doing it, his conduct was mostly passive-aggressive - sighing, frustrated roll-overs in bed, or going up to bed without saying good night. Is that frustration or abuse? I kind of thought the line was closer to sexual coercion. (Maybe I'm minimizing due to residual guilt?) As for the laughing, online it seems a lot of folks think that sex is Fun! and sex noises are Funny! and women who get upset with their partner for laughing at them are over-reacting and wound too tight. I don't necessarily agree, given how shitty I felt when he did it, but I can see the POV.
Sex was a charged issue in our marriage so I'm being careful about labeling things abuse. Now, the way he treated me with contempt and used me and lied to me and snuck behind my back and spent our money to conduct his EA [EDIT: and repeatedly implored me to get on a GLP-1 despite it not being medically necessary], as well as his post D-Day admission that he knew how badly I would be hurt by an affair but he wanted out so he did it anyway because he knew I'd be done with the marriage - that's emotional and psychological abuse of the highest order. When I started thinking about it in those terms after D-Day, it caused my only break in NC - I texted WH2 to say "You must really hate me." (I came to my senses and re-blocked him right away so I didn't see his response.) But I realized he must have convinced himself that I'm a terrible person/wife to act that way. Or he's a sociopath.
[EDIT: Does there have to be intent to harm for conduct to be abusive? Maybe that's where I'm getting hung up.]
you are worthy of being respected- you are not just a machine for men’s pleasure .
Once he was gone, I realized that he never expressed desire for me, just for sex. I could have been anyone. That was incredibly painful to think about - and it's another piece of the puzzle re: my lack of desire for him.
The benefit of him being goth subculture is that it’s a smaller community so you should oust what kind of person he is and hopefully they will shun him from their community too
Of course it hit me like a ton of bricks. I really took it to heart. Until one day I realized I’m not responsible for his happiness — that’s on him.
So please don’t allow your CH to negatively impact your whole history as a married couple by making it out to be "he was unhappy all the time" and it’s your fault.
WH2 has always been a sucker for recency bias. Looking back at his demeanor and conduct, he may have been working himself up to leave for much of this year. I was doing some accounting and I think I know the exact day in April he decided he was done because on D-Day, he mentioned a conversation that annoyed him and his spending habits took a dramatic turn the same weekend we had it. He met AP and embarked on an EA a couple weeks later. But he changed a lot in the year before - it was so subtle I didn't notice until he was suddenly an unhappy, miserable guy I didn't recognize and D-Day soon followed. I think you're right that I'm going to have to keep thinking of them as two people so I don't break my brain.
I'll try not to keeping taking his words to heart. It's hard. I was reading that if one person carries a marriage, they usually take on the guilt for its demise in a way the other never does. So unfair!
[This message edited by purplecheetah at 3:30 PM, Monday, September 21st]